https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372606 The tribunal upheld the Registrar of Companies' decision to strike off the company's name, finding that the necessary steps under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013 were followed. It concluded that the appellant was given a fair opportunity to be heard and that the company was not engaged in any business operations based on the evidence presented. The tribunal also rejected the appellant's argument regarding the default in filing statutory returns and upheld the NCLT's interpretation of nil tax returns as indicative of non-business activities. The appeal was dismissed with no costs awarded. en-us Thu, 06 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372606 The tribunal upheld the Registrar of Companies' decision to strike off the company's name, finding that the necessary steps under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013 were followed. It concluded that the appellant was given a fair opportunity to be heard and that the company was not engaged in any business operations based on the evidence presented. The tribunal also rejected the appellant's argument regarding the default in filing statutory returns and upheld the NCLT's interpretation of nil tax returns as indicative of non-business activities. The appeal was dismissed with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 06 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372606