<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1371 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372602</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Customs Department in an appeal under Section 130 A of the Customs Act, 1962 against CESTAT&#039;s order. The case involved the confiscation of gold and penalty imposition on a respondent attempting to smuggle gold into India from Nepal. The court emphasized the mandatory requirement of a declaration under Section 77 for the return of detained articles, which the respondent failed to fulfill. Additionally, the court highlighted the violation of specific notifications prohibiting the import of foreign-origin gold from Nepal. Consequently, the court set aside the tribunal&#039;s decision, upholding the Customs authorities&#039; actions in confiscating the gold and imposing penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2019 13:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1371 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372602</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Customs Department in an appeal under Section 130 A of the Customs Act, 1962 against CESTAT&#039;s order. The case involved the confiscation of gold and penalty imposition on a respondent attempting to smuggle gold into India from Nepal. The court emphasized the mandatory requirement of a declaration under Section 77 for the return of detained articles, which the respondent failed to fulfill. Additionally, the court highlighted the violation of specific notifications prohibiting the import of foreign-origin gold from Nepal. Consequently, the court set aside the tribunal&#039;s decision, upholding the Customs authorities&#039; actions in confiscating the gold and imposing penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>