<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1369 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372600</link>
    <description>In writ jurisdiction, a court may in rare and deserving cases moderate a statutory pre-deposit requirement under the Customs Act where rigid insistence would defeat justice. The material showed that the imported goods were still pending clearance and the appeal had been rejected only for non-payment of pre-deposit. Relief was considered appropriate by directing a reduced deposit, after which the appellate authority was to entertain the appeal and decide it on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2018 10:39:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1369 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372600</link>
      <description>In writ jurisdiction, a court may in rare and deserving cases moderate a statutory pre-deposit requirement under the Customs Act where rigid insistence would defeat justice. The material showed that the imported goods were still pending clearance and the appeal had been rejected only for non-payment of pre-deposit. Relief was considered appropriate by directing a reduced deposit, after which the appellate authority was to entertain the appeal and decide it on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>