https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372591 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand and penalty, except for any part falling within the limitation period. The absence of mala fide intent led to the rejection of the extended period of limitation and the imposition of a penalty. The appellant was required to pay any amount falling within the limitation period, as quantified by the Original Adjudicating Authority. en-us Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Dec 2018 10:38:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372591 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand and penalty, except for any part falling within the limitation period. The absence of mala fide intent led to the rejection of the extended period of limitation and the imposition of a penalty. The appellant was required to pay any amount falling within the limitation period, as quantified by the Original Adjudicating Authority. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 25 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372591