<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1357 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372588</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the revised assessment orders for various assessment years challenged by a dealer in jewels and ornaments due to lack of personal hearing and independent application of mind by the tax authority. The Court emphasized the necessity of providing a personal hearing even if objections were filed and requiring the assessing officer to independently consider objections before passing orders. The matter was remanded back to the tax authority with directions to conduct a personal hearing, provide reasoned orders, and comply with the law within six weeks. Non-cooperation from the petitioner could result in appropriate action by the tax authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2018 10:38:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1357 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372588</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the revised assessment orders for various assessment years challenged by a dealer in jewels and ornaments due to lack of personal hearing and independent application of mind by the tax authority. The Court emphasized the necessity of providing a personal hearing even if objections were filed and requiring the assessing officer to independently consider objections before passing orders. The matter was remanded back to the tax authority with directions to conduct a personal hearing, provide reasoned orders, and comply with the law within six weeks. Non-cooperation from the petitioner could result in appropriate action by the tax authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>