<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1752 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277831</link>
    <description>The court approved the amalgamation scheme of three companies under sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013. The scheme, involving the merger of two transferor companies with a transferee company, was found to be fair, reasonable, and legally sound. The court concluded that the scheme complied with all statutory requirements and did not violate any provisions of relevant laws. The judgment sanctioned the scheme, specified implementation directions, and highlighted the need for regulatory authorities to act accordingly. Compliance with statutory obligations, addressing observations, and ensuring fairness and legality were key considerations in the court&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2018 00:40:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1752 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277831</link>
      <description>The court approved the amalgamation scheme of three companies under sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013. The scheme, involving the merger of two transferor companies with a transferee company, was found to be fair, reasonable, and legally sound. The court concluded that the scheme complied with all statutory requirements and did not violate any provisions of relevant laws. The judgment sanctioned the scheme, specified implementation directions, and highlighted the need for regulatory authorities to act accordingly. Compliance with statutory obligations, addressing observations, and ensuring fairness and legality were key considerations in the court&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>