<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1812 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277825</link>
    <description>The Madras High Court, in a case concerning the challenge to seizure orders under the Customs Act, 1962, and a request for provisional release of seized jewellery, directed the petitioners, a husband and wife, to deposit 50% of the duty for the value of the seized gold jewellery. Upon compliance, the seized items were ordered to be released immediately, with the authorities retaining the right to take further action under Section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court emphasized the petitioners&#039; cooperation in any adjudication proceedings. The writ petitions were allowed with no costs imposed, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2018 00:38:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1812 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277825</link>
      <description>The Madras High Court, in a case concerning the challenge to seizure orders under the Customs Act, 1962, and a request for provisional release of seized jewellery, directed the petitioners, a husband and wife, to deposit 50% of the duty for the value of the seized gold jewellery. Upon compliance, the seized items were ordered to be released immediately, with the authorities retaining the right to take further action under Section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court emphasized the petitioners&#039; cooperation in any adjudication proceedings. The writ petitions were allowed with no costs imposed, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>