https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277826 Bail discretion under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was exercised individually for each accused in a disproportionate assets prosecution. The Court noted allegations of accommodation entries through firms and companies, but found that Garima Bhushan and Karuna Singh had separate family lives and income profiles, so their applications merited bail. For Sunny Yadav, the Court found the allegations more substantial and his role the most serious, so regular bail was declined, with only limited interim protection granted to approach a higher forum. en-us Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Dec 2018 00:38:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277826 Bail discretion under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was exercised individually for each accused in a disproportionate assets prosecution. The Court noted allegations of accommodation entries through firms and companies, but found that Garima Bhushan and Karuna Singh had separate family lives and income profiles, so their applications merited bail. For Sunny Yadav, the Court found the allegations more substantial and his role the most serious, so regular bail was declined, with only limited interim protection granted to approach a higher forum. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 30 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277826