https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277827 Article 32 relief was declined on the merits, with petitioners directed to approach the Trial Court first. They were permitted to appear before that court the following day and seek relief under Section 88 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and/or bail. The Trial Court was directed to consider those applications forthwith. If the applications were rejected, protection from arrest would continue for 30 days, enabling the petitioners to seek relief before the High Court or another higher forum. The writ petition therefore remained unentertained on merits, subject to these limited protective directions. en-us Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Dec 2018 00:38:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277827 Article 32 relief was declined on the merits, with petitioners directed to approach the Trial Court first. They were permitted to appear before that court the following day and seek relief under Section 88 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and/or bail. The Trial Court was directed to consider those applications forthwith. If the applications were rejected, protection from arrest would continue for 30 days, enabling the petitioners to seek relief before the High Court or another higher forum. The writ petition therefore remained unentertained on merits, subject to these limited protective directions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277827