https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277827 The SC declined to entertain the Article 32 petition on merits and required the petitioners to approach the Trial Court first. It nevertheless granted limited protective relief by allowing them to appear before the Trial Court the next day, permitting applications under Section 88 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and/or bail applications, and directing prompt consideration of those applications. If the applications were rejected, the petitioners were protected against arrest for 30 days to enable recourse to the High Court or another higher forum. en-us Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Dec 2018 00:38:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277827 The SC declined to entertain the Article 32 petition on merits and required the petitioners to approach the Trial Court first. It nevertheless granted limited protective relief by allowing them to appear before the Trial Court the next day, permitting applications under Section 88 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and/or bail applications, and directing prompt consideration of those applications. If the applications were rejected, the petitioners were protected against arrest for 30 days to enable recourse to the High Court or another higher forum. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277827