<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1192 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277809</link>
    <description>The court quashed the transfer orders under s. 127(2) of the IT Act, 1961, as they lacked specific reasons for the transfer and failed to comply with procedural requirements. The court emphasized the importance of providing detailed reasons and ensuring a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to be heard. The writ petitions were allowed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2018 12:10:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1192 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277809</link>
      <description>The court quashed the transfer orders under s. 127(2) of the IT Act, 1961, as they lacked specific reasons for the transfer and failed to comply with procedural requirements. The court emphasized the importance of providing detailed reasons and ensuring a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to be heard. The writ petitions were allowed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>