https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372585 The court dismissed the petition challenging an enquiry initiated by respondent No. 2 under the Central Excise Act and GST Act. It held that the petitioner, registered in Mumbai, fell under the jurisdiction of Mumbai authorities despite primary business operations in Jaipur. The court found no basis to interfere with the investigation and clarified that providing photocopies of documents already submitted to Jaipur authorities would suffice for the Mumbai authorities. This decision clarifies jurisdictional issues and petitioner obligations under the Central Excise Act and GST Act. en-us Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Feb 2025 11:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372585 The court dismissed the petition challenging an enquiry initiated by respondent No. 2 under the Central Excise Act and GST Act. It held that the petitioner, registered in Mumbai, fell under the jurisdiction of Mumbai authorities despite primary business operations in Jaipur. The court found no basis to interfere with the investigation and clarified that providing photocopies of documents already submitted to Jaipur authorities would suffice for the Mumbai authorities. This decision clarifies jurisdictional issues and petitioner obligations under the Central Excise Act and GST Act. Case-Laws GST Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372585