<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1347 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372578</link>
    <description>The court set aside the notice for reopening the assessment as it was deemed invalid due to being based on a mere change of opinion without any new material. The court found that the interest income had been scrutinized during the original assessment, and there was no justification for the reopening. The petitioner&#039;s challenge to the notice was upheld, and the court disposed of the petition accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 17:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1347 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372578</link>
      <description>The court set aside the notice for reopening the assessment as it was deemed invalid due to being based on a mere change of opinion without any new material. The court found that the interest income had been scrutinized during the original assessment, and there was no justification for the reopening. The petitioner&#039;s challenge to the notice was upheld, and the court disposed of the petition accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>