<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1338 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372569</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals, upholding that the expenses, including deputation and other costs, hotel management fees, and depreciation on intangible assets, were essential for the business purpose. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled that the royalty amount was not accrued during the relevant year, leading to the deletion of the addition as income. The decisions were based on findings that supported the necessity and non-accrual of the expenses and income, respectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 15:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=549017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1338 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372569</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals, upholding that the expenses, including deputation and other costs, hotel management fees, and depreciation on intangible assets, were essential for the business purpose. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled that the royalty amount was not accrued during the relevant year, leading to the deletion of the addition as income. The decisions were based on findings that supported the necessity and non-accrual of the expenses and income, respectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>