<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1306 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372537</link>
    <description>The court partially allowed the appeal, confirming certain directions while modifying others to alleviate the financial strain on the appellant and expedite the adjudication process, maintaining fairness and justice in the proceedings. The appellant was directed to remit a specific sum as cash deposit, with the Bank Guarantee not requiring renewal, and the adjudication process was instructed to be completed expeditiously within three months, provided the appellant cooperated fully.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:23:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=548985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1306 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372537</link>
      <description>The court partially allowed the appeal, confirming certain directions while modifying others to alleviate the financial strain on the appellant and expedite the adjudication process, maintaining fairness and justice in the proceedings. The appellant was directed to remit a specific sum as cash deposit, with the Bank Guarantee not requiring renewal, and the adjudication process was instructed to be completed expeditiously within three months, provided the appellant cooperated fully.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>