https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372534 The appeal under Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, challenging the Provisional Attachment Order issued by the Respondent was allowed. The impugned order and the provisional attachment order were set aside. However, the Appellant was directed to secure the alleged amount attributed as proceeds of crime and deposit it in favor of the respondent to ensure compliance with the Act, with the provision for lifting the attachment upon deposit. en-us Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:22:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372534 The appeal under Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, challenging the Provisional Attachment Order issued by the Respondent was allowed. The impugned order and the provisional attachment order were set aside. However, the Appellant was directed to secure the alleged amount attributed as proceeds of crime and deposit it in favor of the respondent to ensure compliance with the Act, with the provision for lifting the attachment upon deposit. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372534