https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372531 The Court dismissed the appeal challenging the CESTAT order under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It emphasized revenue neutrality in the utilization of CENVAT credit among units, highlighting that the distribution of credit would not impact the outcome. The case revolved around interpreting Rule 7 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, with the Court ultimately finding that compliance with distribution requirements for CENVAT credit among units providing output services was crucial. en-us Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Jun 2019 14:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372531 The Court dismissed the appeal challenging the CESTAT order under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It emphasized revenue neutrality in the utilization of CENVAT credit among units, highlighting that the distribution of credit would not impact the outcome. The case revolved around interpreting Rule 7 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, with the Court ultimately finding that compliance with distribution requirements for CENVAT credit among units providing output services was crucial. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372531