<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1296 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372527</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals, confirming the demand for service tax for the normal period (April 2005 to March 2006) while setting aside the demand for the extended period. Penalties imposed on the Managing Director, Joint Director, and the company were also set aside. The case was remanded for re-quantification of the demand for the normal period, with directions for interest payment in case of any tax payment delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:22:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=548975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1296 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372527</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals, confirming the demand for service tax for the normal period (April 2005 to March 2006) while setting aside the demand for the extended period. Penalties imposed on the Managing Director, Joint Director, and the company were also set aside. The case was remanded for re-quantification of the demand for the normal period, with directions for interest payment in case of any tax payment delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>