https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372519 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in four appeals challenging the rejection of appeals and upholding of Orders-in-Original by the Commissioner (Appeals). The judgment clarified that Rule 6 of the CCR, 2004, concerning the demand for the value of electricity sold, did not apply to non-excisable goods like electricity. The Tribunal emphasized that electricity was not excisable or exempted goods, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and granting consequential relief to the appellants. en-us Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:21:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372519 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in four appeals challenging the rejection of appeals and upholding of Orders-in-Original by the Commissioner (Appeals). The judgment clarified that Rule 6 of the CCR, 2004, concerning the demand for the value of electricity sold, did not apply to non-excisable goods like electricity. The Tribunal emphasized that electricity was not excisable or exempted goods, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and granting consequential relief to the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372519