https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372516 A writ petition challenging an assessment order under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 was not entertained because an efficacious statutory appeal was available under Section 26. The HC noted that the impugned order had been passed under Section 23 and that the appellate authority was competent to examine the petitioner's grievances and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. On that basis, the court declined writ intervention and directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. en-us Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:21:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372516 A writ petition challenging an assessment order under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 was not entertained because an efficacious statutory appeal was available under Section 26. The HC noted that the impugned order had been passed under Section 23 and that the appellate authority was competent to examine the petitioner's grievances and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. On that basis, the court declined writ intervention and directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372516