https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277792 Default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. was protected where the prosecution had not produced the chemical examination and quantitative analysis report within time to establish the narcotic quantity. The Court noted that, without that material, the Sessions Judge could not determine whether the NDPS punishment regime applicable was lesser or more stringent, and the delay was attributable to the prosecution. On that basis, the grant of bail was held not to warrant interference, and the request for cancellation was rejected. en-us Mon, 03 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Dec 2018 17:39:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277792 Default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. was protected where the prosecution had not produced the chemical examination and quantitative analysis report within time to establish the narcotic quantity. The Court noted that, without that material, the Sessions Judge could not determine whether the NDPS punishment regime applicable was lesser or more stringent, and the delay was attributable to the prosecution. On that basis, the grant of bail was held not to warrant interference, and the request for cancellation was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277792