<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 48 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15884</link>
    <description>The court ruled against the company, denying the development rebate claim on the increased machinery cost due to currency devaluation. The decision was based on the interpretation of section 43A of the Income-tax Act, which prohibits considering exchange rate fluctuations for development rebate purposes. The outcome favored the Revenue, and the case was disposed of without any order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:39:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 48 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15884</link>
      <description>The court ruled against the company, denying the development rebate claim on the increased machinery cost due to currency devaluation. The decision was based on the interpretation of section 43A of the Income-tax Act, which prohibits considering exchange rate fluctuations for development rebate purposes. The outcome favored the Revenue, and the case was disposed of without any order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>