<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (10) TMI 25 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15880</link>
    <description>The court held that the Income-tax Officer was not justified in rectifying the assessment for the year 1972-73 under section 154. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the development rebate based on the subsequent creation of the reserve was upheld. The question of law was answered in the affirmative against the Revenue, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:31:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (10) TMI 25 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15880</link>
      <description>The court held that the Income-tax Officer was not justified in rectifying the assessment for the year 1972-73 under section 154. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the development rebate based on the subsequent creation of the reserve was upheld. The question of law was answered in the affirmative against the Revenue, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>