<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1270 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372501</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue, setting aside the orders of the Tribunal and the CIT (A). The court remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, directing a review of whether the expenditure on modernization expenses could be classified as revenue expenditure based on legal principles discussed in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2018 08:33:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=548670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1270 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372501</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue, setting aside the orders of the Tribunal and the CIT (A). The court remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, directing a review of whether the expenditure on modernization expenses could be classified as revenue expenditure based on legal principles discussed in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>