<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 80 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15864</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the Appellate Tribunal erred in accepting the annual letting value declared by the assessee for consecutive assessment years. The court emphasized that the annual letting value should increase over time unless valid reasons are provided for a decreasing trend. As the assessee failed to demonstrate such reasons, the court upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s approach of maintaining the value declared for the initial assessment year. The court found the Tribunal&#039;s consideration of irrelevant material and its inference to be against the proper appreciation of evidence, ultimately ruling against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:55:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 80 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15864</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the Appellate Tribunal erred in accepting the annual letting value declared by the assessee for consecutive assessment years. The court emphasized that the annual letting value should increase over time unless valid reasons are provided for a decreasing trend. As the assessee failed to demonstrate such reasons, the court upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s approach of maintaining the value declared for the initial assessment year. The court found the Tribunal&#039;s consideration of irrelevant material and its inference to be against the proper appreciation of evidence, ultimately ruling against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>