<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1235 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372466</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the manufacturing company appellant, allowing Cenvat credit on disputed goods and overturning penalties imposed on co-appellants. The appellant successfully demonstrated the legitimate use of the goods in manufacturing high-quality products, refuting Revenue&#039;s allegations. Lack of evidence of diversion or substitution of goods weakened Revenue&#039;s case. The Tribunal found the disputed goods formed a small percentage of total purchases, with suppliers confirming supply to the appellant. Consequently, the impugned order denying credit was set aside, and appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2018 07:55:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=548622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1235 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372466</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the manufacturing company appellant, allowing Cenvat credit on disputed goods and overturning penalties imposed on co-appellants. The appellant successfully demonstrated the legitimate use of the goods in manufacturing high-quality products, refuting Revenue&#039;s allegations. Lack of evidence of diversion or substitution of goods weakened Revenue&#039;s case. The Tribunal found the disputed goods formed a small percentage of total purchases, with suppliers confirming supply to the appellant. Consequently, the impugned order denying credit was set aside, and appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>