https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277781 Order II Rule 2 bars a later suit only when it arises from the same cause of action and omits relief that could have been claimed earlier; a prior injunction action and a later suit for declaration and partition based on title were treated as distinct, so the bar did not apply. Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013 ousts civil court jurisdiction only where the Tribunal is empowered to decide the matter; seriously disputed questions of title and proprietary shares in immovable property remained within civil court jurisdiction. Interference with ad interim injunction is warranted only for perversity or patent illegality, and no such defect was shown. en-us Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Jul 2025 11:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277781 Order II Rule 2 bars a later suit only when it arises from the same cause of action and omits relief that could have been claimed earlier; a prior injunction action and a later suit for declaration and partition based on title were treated as distinct, so the bar did not apply. Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013 ousts civil court jurisdiction only where the Tribunal is empowered to decide the matter; seriously disputed questions of title and proprietary shares in immovable property remained within civil court jurisdiction. Interference with ad interim injunction is warranted only for perversity or patent illegality, and no such defect was shown. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277781