<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (10) TMI 21 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15856</link>
    <description>The court held that tax should be deducted at source on the gross amount of interest credited, not on the net amount after mutual set-off. The assessee&#039;s argument that tax should be deducted on the net interest was rejected. The court emphasized that the statutory obligation to deduct tax arises at the time of crediting the gross interest amount, as per section 194A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Therefore, the Revenue&#039;s challenge was upheld, and the court ruled in their favor, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:41:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (10) TMI 21 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15856</link>
      <description>The court held that tax should be deducted at source on the gross amount of interest credited, not on the net amount after mutual set-off. The assessee&#039;s argument that tax should be deducted on the net interest was rejected. The court emphasized that the statutory obligation to deduct tax arises at the time of crediting the gross interest amount, as per section 194A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Therefore, the Revenue&#039;s challenge was upheld, and the court ruled in their favor, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>