<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1212 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372443</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal challenging the validity of the assessment and the disallowance of interest. However, the Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the addition in dairy business income, finding no infirmity in the assessment order. The issue of unexplained investment in jewelry was set aside for further verification by the Assessing Officer, with directions to provide the assessee with an opportunity for a hearing. The appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2018 08:49:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=548541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1212 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372443</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal challenging the validity of the assessment and the disallowance of interest. However, the Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the addition in dairy business income, finding no infirmity in the assessment order. The issue of unexplained investment in jewelry was set aside for further verification by the Assessing Officer, with directions to provide the assessee with an opportunity for a hearing. The appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>