<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1211 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372442</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partially, granting the deduction under Section 10A for interest income but denying it for miscellaneous income due to lack of evidence. The interest income of INR 24,306,435 was considered eligible for deduction, aligning with the Karnataka High Court&#039;s interpretation that such income derived from surplus funds qualifies. However, the miscellaneous income of INR 1,281,527 was excluded from the deduction as the nature of this income was not adequately substantiated by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2018 08:49:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=548539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1211 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372442</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partially, granting the deduction under Section 10A for interest income but denying it for miscellaneous income due to lack of evidence. The interest income of INR 24,306,435 was considered eligible for deduction, aligning with the Karnataka High Court&#039;s interpretation that such income derived from surplus funds qualifies. However, the miscellaneous income of INR 1,281,527 was excluded from the deduction as the nature of this income was not adequately substantiated by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>