<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1205 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372436</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of the addition under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act. The disallowance of sales promotion expenses was upheld. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, confirming that the rental income from warehousing activities should be classified as business income and there was no violation of Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2018 08:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=548531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1205 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372436</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of the addition under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act. The disallowance of sales promotion expenses was upheld. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, confirming that the rental income from warehousing activities should be classified as business income and there was no violation of Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>