<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1189 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372420</link>
    <description>The judgment focused on the tax liability of services provided to a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) unit. It emphasized the exemption from service tax under the SEZ Act, citing relevant provisions and precedents. The court held that services rendered to SEZ units are not taxable, overturning the lower authorities&#039; decisions and allowing the appeal. The judgment underscored the supremacy of SEZ Act provisions in exempting services to SEZ units from service tax, in line with statutory provisions and legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2018 07:19:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=548508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1189 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372420</link>
      <description>The judgment focused on the tax liability of services provided to a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) unit. It emphasized the exemption from service tax under the SEZ Act, citing relevant provisions and precedents. The court held that services rendered to SEZ units are not taxable, overturning the lower authorities&#039; decisions and allowing the appeal. The judgment underscored the supremacy of SEZ Act provisions in exempting services to SEZ units from service tax, in line with statutory provisions and legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>