<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1172 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372403</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of M/s Venugopal Foods Pvt Ltd, setting aside the duty liability of Rs. 11,23,083 under section 11A of Central Excise Act, 1944, for the period from July 2008 to February 2009, along with interest under section 11AB. The case centered on the classification of &#039;sugar syrup&#039; as excisable goods used in biscuit production. The Tribunal found that the &#039;sugar syrup&#039; did not meet the criteria of excisable goods post the May 2008 amendment, emphasizing its unique role in biscuit manufacturing and overturning the lower authorities&#039; decision based on marketability and fructose content considerations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2018 07:18:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=548485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1172 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372403</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of M/s Venugopal Foods Pvt Ltd, setting aside the duty liability of Rs. 11,23,083 under section 11A of Central Excise Act, 1944, for the period from July 2008 to February 2009, along with interest under section 11AB. The case centered on the classification of &#039;sugar syrup&#039; as excisable goods used in biscuit production. The Tribunal found that the &#039;sugar syrup&#039; did not meet the criteria of excisable goods post the May 2008 amendment, emphasizing its unique role in biscuit manufacturing and overturning the lower authorities&#039; decision based on marketability and fructose content considerations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>