<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 50 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15848</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that commission payments to foreign agents did not qualify for weighted deduction under section 35B(1)(b)(iv) of the Income-tax Act as they did not constitute expenditure on maintaining an agency outside India. The judgment emphasized the necessity of demonstrating ongoing agency maintenance and actual expenditure for claiming deductions under the provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:06:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 50 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15848</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that commission payments to foreign agents did not qualify for weighted deduction under section 35B(1)(b)(iv) of the Income-tax Act as they did not constitute expenditure on maintaining an agency outside India. The judgment emphasized the necessity of demonstrating ongoing agency maintenance and actual expenditure for claiming deductions under the provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>