<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1203 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277766</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the allowance of MAT credit and the treatment of surcharge and education cess in the credit for set off. The Tribunal ruled that MAT credit should be allowed against tax liability before surcharge and education cess or that the MAT credit amount should include surcharge and education cess for credit against tax payable inclusive of surcharge and education cess.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2018 06:04:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=548465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1203 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277766</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the allowance of MAT credit and the treatment of surcharge and education cess in the credit for set off. The Tribunal ruled that MAT credit should be allowed against tax liability before surcharge and education cess or that the MAT credit amount should include surcharge and education cess for credit against tax payable inclusive of surcharge and education cess.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>