<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1480 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277767</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the inclusion of surcharge and cess in Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) credit under Section 115JAA, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal and favoring the assessee. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes regarding the deduction for gratuity paid to employees under Section 40A(7), remitting the issue for verification by the Assessing Officer. The order was pronounced on May 19, 2016, at Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2018 06:04:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=548464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1480 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277767</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the inclusion of surcharge and cess in Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) credit under Section 115JAA, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal and favoring the assessee. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes regarding the deduction for gratuity paid to employees under Section 40A(7), remitting the issue for verification by the Assessing Officer. The order was pronounced on May 19, 2016, at Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>