<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (12) TMI 334 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277762</link>
    <description>Ironing stitched garments with electrical power was treated as part of the manufacturing process for extended coverage under the Employees&#039; State Insurance Act because the expression was given wide scope and included finishing or preparing goods for delivery and commercial use, even without creation of a new product. The tailoring firms therefore fell within clause (1) of the notification. The firms were not excluded by reference to the definition of &quot;shop&quot; under the Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, since that meaning could not be imported into the ESI notification. The extended ESI notification applied, the ESI Court&#039;s view was set aside, and the employees&#039; applications were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 15:13:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=548423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (12) TMI 334 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277762</link>
      <description>Ironing stitched garments with electrical power was treated as part of the manufacturing process for extended coverage under the Employees&#039; State Insurance Act because the expression was given wide scope and included finishing or preparing goods for delivery and commercial use, even without creation of a new product. The tailoring firms therefore fell within clause (1) of the notification. The firms were not excluded by reference to the definition of &quot;shop&quot; under the Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, since that meaning could not be imported into the ESI notification. The extended ESI notification applied, the ESI Court&#039;s view was set aside, and the employees&#039; applications were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>