<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (2) TMI 106 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277760</link>
    <description>Section 12(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 requires an exporter to realise and repatriate the full export value declared in Form G.R. 1 within the prescribed period; over-invoicing does not displace that obligation. Discretionary certiorari relief may be refused where the challenge depends on the applicant&#039;s own fraudulent conduct, voluntary disclosures, or false declarations. Section 23(1) provides statutory guidance for selecting adjudication or prosecution and determining penalties within prescribed limits, addressing an Article 14 challenge. Allegations of bias or extraneous considerations require material showing reliance on irrelevant matter; an available statutory appeal may support judicial restraint.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=548226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (2) TMI 106 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277760</link>
      <description>Section 12(2) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 requires an exporter to realise and repatriate the full export value declared in Form G.R. 1 within the prescribed period; over-invoicing does not displace that obligation. Discretionary certiorari relief may be refused where the challenge depends on the applicant&#039;s own fraudulent conduct, voluntary disclosures, or false declarations. Section 23(1) provides statutory guidance for selecting adjudication or prosecution and determining penalties within prescribed limits, addressing an Article 14 challenge. Allegations of bias or extraneous considerations require material showing reliance on irrelevant matter; an available statutory appeal may support judicial restraint.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>