https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277759 In a conspiracy prosecution, the validity of the complaint and sanction was upheld despite technical defects, because the complaint was made under de facto authority, the defect caused no failure of justice, and the charges were properly joined as arising from the same transaction. The Court treated the Dacca Anusilan Samity as a revolutionary society with a concealed object to subvert Government by force, relying on secrecy, discipline, official documents, and surrounding evidence. Individual liability, however, depended on reliable proof of membership, knowledge of the secret object, and participation in the conspiracy; convictions were sustained only where that proof existed, while others were acquitted. en-us Tue, 02 Apr 1912 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Dec 2018 12:34:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277759 In a conspiracy prosecution, the validity of the complaint and sanction was upheld despite technical defects, because the complaint was made under de facto authority, the defect caused no failure of justice, and the charges were properly joined as arising from the same transaction. The Court treated the Dacca Anusilan Samity as a revolutionary society with a concealed object to subvert Government by force, relying on secrecy, discipline, official documents, and surrounding evidence. Individual liability, however, depended on reliable proof of membership, knowledge of the secret object, and participation in the conspiracy; convictions were sustained only where that proof existed, while others were acquitted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 Apr 1912 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277759