<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (11) TMI 109 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277756</link>
    <description>Preventive detention under the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 is confined to conduct prejudicial to public order, and assaults or threats directed at identified individuals may be too remote if they affect only law and order rather than the community at large. Grounds based on such isolated incidents were treated as insufficient where no proximate connection with public order was shown. Article 22(5) also requires each communicated ground to be definite enough for an effective representation; if one material ground is vague, the detention is vitiated and is not saved by other specific or valid grounds. The affected detenus were entitled to release.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 12:09:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=548174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (11) TMI 109 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277756</link>
      <description>Preventive detention under the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 is confined to conduct prejudicial to public order, and assaults or threats directed at identified individuals may be too remote if they affect only law and order rather than the community at large. Grounds based on such isolated incidents were treated as insufficient where no proximate connection with public order was shown. Article 22(5) also requires each communicated ground to be definite enough for an effective representation; if one material ground is vague, the detention is vitiated and is not saved by other specific or valid grounds. The affected detenus were entitled to release.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>