<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1150 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372381</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the interest income earned from fixed deposits for opening letter of credits and retention of margin money should be classified as profits and gains of business, rather than income from other sources. As a result, the assessee was not allowed to set off un-absorbed depreciation against income from other sources. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 07:09:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=548053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1150 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372381</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the interest income earned from fixed deposits for opening letter of credits and retention of margin money should be classified as profits and gains of business, rather than income from other sources. As a result, the assessee was not allowed to set off un-absorbed depreciation against income from other sources. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>