https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372368 Stay of outstanding tax demand was extended because the delay in hearing the appeal was not attributable to the assessee. The assessee had complied with earlier stay conditions and remained ready to argue the appeal, while adjournments arose from factors beyond its control, including pendency of connected matters and lack of available time. As there was no material change in facts, the balance of convenience favoured continuation of protection against recovery. The stay was extended for six months or until disposal of the appeal, whichever was earlier, subject to a direction that adjournments be sought only for bona fide reasons. en-us Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Dec 2018 18:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372368 Stay of outstanding tax demand was extended because the delay in hearing the appeal was not attributable to the assessee. The assessee had complied with earlier stay conditions and remained ready to argue the appeal, while adjournments arose from factors beyond its control, including pendency of connected matters and lack of available time. As there was no material change in facts, the balance of convenience favoured continuation of protection against recovery. The stay was extended for six months or until disposal of the appeal, whichever was earlier, subject to a direction that adjournments be sought only for bona fide reasons. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372368