<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1127 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372358</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both appeals. The demand for convention services and the 10% service charge under Mandap keeper services was confirmed. The demand under Business Auxiliary Service for foreign incentives was dropped. The demand for services received from outside India was confirmed only for the period post 18.04.2006. The extended period for issuing the show cause notice was deemed applicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 17:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=548022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1127 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372358</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both appeals. The demand for convention services and the 10% service charge under Mandap keeper services was confirmed. The demand under Business Auxiliary Service for foreign incentives was dropped. The demand for services received from outside India was confirmed only for the period post 18.04.2006. The extended period for issuing the show cause notice was deemed applicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>