https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372350 An internal confidential departmental communication closing a complaint did not amount to a final communicated order because it was not addressed to or served on the employee, and therefore did not create an enforceable right or concluded closure. The Central Vigilance Commission's views had to be considered before any final decision to close the complaint under the statutory vigilance framework, so the Government could act on the Commission's advice before taking final action. The later issuance of a charge-sheet under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 was not a reopening of a concluded matter, and the disciplinary challenge failed. en-us Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Jun 2019 17:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372350 An internal confidential departmental communication closing a complaint did not amount to a final communicated order because it was not addressed to or served on the employee, and therefore did not create an enforceable right or concluded closure. The Central Vigilance Commission's views had to be considered before any final decision to close the complaint under the statutory vigilance framework, so the Government could act on the Commission's advice before taking final action. The later issuance of a charge-sheet under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 was not a reopening of a concluded matter, and the disciplinary challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372350