<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Petitioner Misclassified as Manufacturer Instead of Trader, Faces Demand u/s 11A of Central Excise Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=43434</link>
    <description>Jurisdiction to raise demand u/s 11A central excise - extended period of limitation - petitioner availed the benefit of the Duty Free Credit Entitlement (DFCE) scheme. - the petitioner claimed to be a manufacturer and obtained registration for the same, the adjudicating authority found the petitioner to be a trader - Issuance of SCN and order sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 06:50:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 06:50:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Petitioner Misclassified as Manufacturer Instead of Trader, Faces Demand u/s 11A of Central Excise Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=43434</link>
      <description>Jurisdiction to raise demand u/s 11A central excise - extended period of limitation - petitioner availed the benefit of the Duty Free Credit Entitlement (DFCE) scheme. - the petitioner claimed to be a manufacturer and obtained registration for the same, the adjudicating authority found the petitioner to be a trader - Issuance of SCN and order sustained.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 06:50:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=43434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>