<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1096 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372327</link>
    <description>Refund of Education Cess and Secondary Higher Education Cess was treated as admissible under the area-based exemption notification because the Supreme Court had already decided the issue in favour of the assessee. The Tribunal regarded the question as no longer res integra and applied that binding position, resulting in the impugned orders being set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 06:48:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1096 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372327</link>
      <description>Refund of Education Cess and Secondary Higher Education Cess was treated as admissible under the area-based exemption notification because the Supreme Court had already decided the issue in favour of the assessee. The Tribunal regarded the question as no longer res integra and applied that binding position, resulting in the impugned orders being set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>