<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1091 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372322</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) invalid due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to specify the exact charge in the notice. The penalty of Rs. 16,00,000 was deleted based on this procedural error, and the merits of the penalty were not addressed. The decision was pronounced on 06.12.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 05:49:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=547959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1091 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372322</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) invalid due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to specify the exact charge in the notice. The penalty of Rs. 16,00,000 was deleted based on this procedural error, and the merits of the penalty were not addressed. The decision was pronounced on 06.12.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=372322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>