<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 22 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15794</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the appeal challenging the refusal to grant interest under section 214 of the Income-tax Act was competent. The Court emphasized that an appeal could be entertained when the entire assessment was disputed, not solely the interest issue. The judgment clarified the legal position on such appeals, citing relevant case laws and directing the Tribunal to reconsider the matter based on the merits of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 11:28:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 22 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15794</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the appeal challenging the refusal to grant interest under section 214 of the Income-tax Act was competent. The Court emphasized that an appeal could be entertained when the entire assessment was disputed, not solely the interest issue. The judgment clarified the legal position on such appeals, citing relevant case laws and directing the Tribunal to reconsider the matter based on the merits of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>