<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 21 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15790</link>
    <description>For computing capital gains on transfer of shares, the cost of bonus shares was treated as 50 per cent of the cost of the original shares. The Court noted that this method of valuation had already been upheld in an earlier decision and that the value adopted as on 1 January 1964 was fixed for spreading the cost between original and bonus shares. The referred question was answered in the affirmative, and the Department&#039;s position was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 11:15:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 21 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15790</link>
      <description>For computing capital gains on transfer of shares, the cost of bonus shares was treated as 50 per cent of the cost of the original shares. The Court noted that this method of valuation had already been upheld in an earlier decision and that the value adopted as on 1 January 1964 was fixed for spreading the cost between original and bonus shares. The referred question was answered in the affirmative, and the Department&#039;s position was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>