https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277738 Under a rent control statute that permits eviction only on specified grounds, a compromise decree for possession is invalid unless the court has judicially satisfied itself that a statutory ground exists. A private compromise cannot override the statutory prohibition or confer jurisdiction to order eviction contrary to Section 13(1) of the Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act, 1952. A challenge under Section 47 CPC can succeed where the decree lacks legal foundation under the rent control law, and such a decree is treated as a nullity and not executable. en-us Tue, 03 Dec 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Dec 2018 15:16:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277738 Under a rent control statute that permits eviction only on specified grounds, a compromise decree for possession is invalid unless the court has judicially satisfied itself that a statutory ground exists. A private compromise cannot override the statutory prohibition or confer jurisdiction to order eviction contrary to Section 13(1) of the Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act, 1952. A challenge under Section 47 CPC can succeed where the decree lacks legal foundation under the rent control law, and such a decree is treated as a nullity and not executable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Dec 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277738