https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277736 The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's judgment and decree, dismissing the appeal. The High Court correctly identified the lease as one for the business, not the premises, excluding it from the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956. Findings on trespass, landlord-tenant relationship, and suit maintainability were upheld. However, the High Court erred in finding default in rent payment due to lack of pleadings and evidence. The appeal was dismissed with no orders as to costs. en-us Fri, 08 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Dec 2018 11:53:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277736 The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's judgment and decree, dismissing the appeal. The High Court correctly identified the lease as one for the business, not the premises, excluding it from the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956. Findings on trespass, landlord-tenant relationship, and suit maintainability were upheld. However, the High Court erred in finding default in rent payment due to lack of pleadings and evidence. The appeal was dismissed with no orders as to costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277736